Active restoration improves soil condition and plant and animal diversity
Tina says that, unfortunately, land restoration efforts are often constrained by legacies of agricultural land-use and active restoration is needed to overcome difficult tipping points and assist an ecosystem’s biodiversity re-assembly and move towards a ‘reference state’.
“Active restoration uses management action such as planting vegetation, weed control, burning, and/or thinning to achieve the desired outcomes.”
- Tina Parkhurst, Murdoch University
Tina and her colleagues, Suzanne Prober (CSIRO) and Rachel Standish (Murdoch University), characterised the chemical and physical properties of soil, vegetation diversity, and ant assemblages (a useful biodiversity indicator) in three different states of production: 1) fallow croplands (restoration starting point); 2) old fields revegetated 10-years ago; and 3) reference woodlands.
They also tested whether the addition of woody debris to revegetated old fields can accelerate restoration outcomes, using a multi-site ‘Before-After Control-Impact’ method.
Results show that at a global scale, restoration has positive effects on soil condition, but inconsistent trends for invertebrate species. Overall, recovery remains incomplete. Tina says that these results were mirrored at a local scale